The Reality Of Faking It

OK, so now we know that Tiger Woods is as champion with golf as he is with womanising. We’re certainly going to see a lot of finger-pointing, condemnation and jokes related to this latest discovery. A star he is, but Tiger Woods doesn’t control the media like some governments. He’s certainly going to get a hard time from the public - especially from the wronged women and envious men.

Of course, stories like Woods’ are hardly new. Some years ago, Chinese superstar Jackie Chan was embroiled in a scandal involving an illegitimate child. A blow from this guy would send a man crashing through doors and walls, but the public, far from his lethal blows, were giving the kungfu superstar more pointed accusations that he could deflect. It doesn’t matter how big or how deft you are. Public opinion reduced poor Jackie from superhero to gutter rat in cyberspace.
The excuse for all this condemnation, especially within conservative Asian societies, is that these folks are supposed to be role models. Our children learn from them, drink the same brand of green tea they drink, use the same brand of shampoo they use, so we must also keep minor wives or sleep with someone else’s husband if they do.
In the Land of Sheltered Walkways, exposure to any form of bad influence is not acceptable. Hence, if a role model ever does something immoral in the eyes of the righteous public to whom similar temptations are totally out of reach, he/she must be brought down. It’s already so unfair that these folks get so many temptations. How dare they succumb? Fortunately Jackie Chan doesn’t depend on Singaporeans to earn a living.
It’s not difficult to see that being a role model can be very tiring. You’re not perfect like everybody else, but you not only have to put on your best behaviour whenever you go public, you’ve got to make sure that anything unpleasant or sinful that you do in private doesn’t get exposed either. You can’t control the exposure. You don’t own all the newsPAPers.
It’s quite understandable that Hongkongers, Taiwanese and even Americans who voted for Bill Clinton are against adultery. Singapore has higher moral standards. Beauty queens are not supposed to steal things, speak bad English and have breast “enhancement”. Wait a minute. I understand the need to make sense and be honest. I may even agree with the no “naughty” photos rule. But no boob job?
It’s deception, they say. Those who “cheat” viewers into paying 20 cents to vote for them with their phones, cheat judges into giving them good points and cheat dirty old men into drooling over their artificially enhanced mammaries are dishonest and must be stripped of their crowns. Future beauty queens must all be examined for surgical scars and xrayed for butt and breasts implants.

Picture of Rachel Kum taken from the New Paper
yao mo gao chor ah? Are they going to xray contestants for dental implants as well? For dentists, dentures, crowns, bridges etc are all supposed to look like real teeth. Does that make me an accomplice to all this “cheating” if I make a replacement for a missing tooth that looks real and helps the contestant win the title of beauty queen? Or must the contestant go on stage with her missing tooth/teeth just to be “fair” to people who can’t win even with a full set of teeth?











